Jeeva @ Ravi vs Inspector of police, Karumalaikoodal police station — 4/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 437ofcpc. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSA160001342026

Filing Number

5/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Sub Court, Mettur

Judge

1-Sub Judge, Mettur

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 437ofcpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jeeva @ Ravi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police, Karumalaikoodal police station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judicial/Revenue proceedings.View PDF

    The Assistant Sessions Judge, Mettur granted bail to accused Jeeva @ Ravi (age 55) charged under IPC sections 395 and 397 (dacoity offences), considering his 7+ months of judicial custody and health issues, despite prosecution's objections based on his status as a habitual offender. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 15 days, and restrictions against absconding, committing similar offences, or tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sub Judge, Mettur

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Sub Judge, Mettur

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Sub Judge, Mettur

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge, Mettur

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Sub Judge, Mettur

  8. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Assistant Sessions Judge, Mettur granted bail to accused Jeeva @ Ravi (age 55) charged under IPC sections 395 and 397 (dacoity offences), considering his 7+ months of judicial custody and health issues, despite prosecution's objections based on his status as a habitual offender. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 15 days, and restrictions against absconding, committing similar offences, or tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case