M.MALIKJAN vs THE MANAGE MENT, TNSTC (Salem) Ltd AND ANOTHER Advocate - P. Ravisankar — 300010/2016
Case under --- Section 33(C)(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
CLP - Claim Petition
CNR: TNSA020000322016
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
Filing Date
15-02-2016
Registration No
300010/2016
Registration Date
14-03-2016
Court
Labour Court, Salem
Judge
3-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.MALIKJAN
Adv. A.Palaniappan, General Secretary
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
Respondent(s)
THE MANAGE MENT, TNSTC (Salem) Ltd AND ANOTHER Advocate - P. Ravisankar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 06-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 07-10-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The Labour Court, Salem (C.P. No. 10 of 2016) dismissed the petitioner's (Mrs. Mamalathi) claim for pension revision dated 17.04.2025. The court found that the basic salary and pension calculations were correctly computed based on the actual salary drawn, and rejected the petitioner's contentions regarding incorrect base salary calculations and dearness allowance (DA) entitlements. The court also held that no additional interest on delayed pension payments was warranted, and upheld the existing pension disbursement calculated at 6% interest rather than the claimed 18%. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Labour Court, Salem (C.P. No. 10 of 2016) dismissed the petitioner's (Mrs. Mamalathi) claim for pension revision dated 17.04.2025. The court found that the basic salary and pension calculations were correctly computed based on the actual salary drawn, and rejected the petitioner's contentions regarding incorrect base salary calculations and dearness allowance (DA) entitlements. The court also held that no additional interest on delayed pension payments was warranted, and upheld the existing pension disbursement calculated at 6% interest rather than the claimed 18%. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts