SI OF POLICE TOWN PS vs PAULDINAKARAN Advocate - GOWRISHANKAR S, GOWRISHANKAR S — 34/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNRP090008722025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
872/2025
Filing Date
05-04-2025
Registration No
34/2025
Registration Date
05-04-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Arakkonam
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
119
Police Station
Arakkonam Town
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI OF POLICE TOWN PS (Police Station)
Adv. YOGALAKSHMI
Respondent(s)
PAULDINAKARAN Advocate - GOWRISHANKAR S, GOWRISHANKAR S
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
Disposed
Arguments
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 26-02-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 23-02-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 27-01-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Case Number: C.C.No.34/2025 | Court: Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Arakkonam | Date: March 9, 2026 Decision The court acquitted both accused persons (Palathinarayan and Vinod Palraj) of charges under IPC Sections 294(b) (obscene acts), 324 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 506(2) (criminal intimidation). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key witnesses, including the injured party (Surendar), contradicted the prosecution's allegations, and critical medical evidence did not sufficiently corroborate the charges. Without reliable testimony and adequate documentary support, the court determined that the required criminal burden of proof was not met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case Number: C.C.No.34/2025 | Court: Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Arakkonam | Date: March 9, 2026 Decision The court acquitted both accused persons (Palathinarayan and Vinod Palraj) of charges under IPC Sections 294(b) (obscene acts), 324 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 506(2) (criminal intimidation). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key witnesses, including the injured party (Surendar), contradicted the prosecution's allegations, and critical medical evidence did not sufficiently corroborate the charges. Without reliable testimony and adequate documentary support, the court determined that the required criminal burden of proof was not met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts