M/s Hindujahousing Finance Limited Rep By Its Authorised Officer Mr Sugumar vs Selvam K — 37/2026

Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14. Status: Service Pending. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRP020004492025

Service Pending

Next Hearing

27th April 2026

e-Filing Number

22-10-2025

Filing Number

449/2025

Filing Date

25-10-2025

Registration No

37/2026

Registration Date

29-01-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ranipet

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet

Acts & Sections

SecuritisationandReconstructionofFinancialAssets&EnforcementofSecurityInterestAct Section 14

Petitioner(s)

M/s Hindujahousing Finance Limited Rep By Its Authorised Officer Mr Sugumar

Adv. Arivazhagan Karunanithi

Respondent(s)

Selvam K

Thenmozhi S

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet

27-03-2026

Service Pending

16-03-2026

Orders

09-03-2026

Appearance

02-03-2026

Appearance

29-01-2026

Appearance

Interim Orders

27-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Case Summary Petition ALLOWED. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet appointed an Advocate Commissioner (Mr. J. Rajendiran) to take possession of the mortgaged property from the respondents on behalf of Hinduja Housing Finance Limited under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The respondents defaulted on a home loan of Rs. 14,50,000 after statutory demand and possession notices were issued, and no proceedings were pending before the DRT or other forums to prevent enforcement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Petition ALLOWED. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet appointed an Advocate Commissioner (Mr. J. Rajendiran) to take possession of the mortgaged property from the respondents on behalf of Hinduja Housing Finance Limited under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The respondents defaulted on a home loan of Rs. 14,50,000 after statutory demand and possession notices were issued, and no proceedings were pending before the DRT or other forums to prevent enforcement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ranipet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case