M/s Hindujahousing Finance Limited Rep By Its Authorised Officer Mr Sugumar vs Selvam K — 37/2026
Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14. Status: Service Pending. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRP020004492025
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
22-10-2025
Filing Number
449/2025
Filing Date
25-10-2025
Registration No
37/2026
Registration Date
29-01-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ranipet
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/s Hindujahousing Finance Limited Rep By Its Authorised Officer Mr Sugumar
Adv. Arivazhagan Karunanithi
Respondent(s)
Selvam K
Thenmozhi S
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet
Service Pending
Orders
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Service Pending | |
| 16-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 09-03-2026 | Appearance | |
| 02-03-2026 | Appearance | |
| 29-01-2026 | Appearance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Petition ALLOWED. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet appointed an Advocate Commissioner (Mr. J. Rajendiran) to take possession of the mortgaged property from the respondents on behalf of Hinduja Housing Finance Limited under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The respondents defaulted on a home loan of Rs. 14,50,000 after statutory demand and possession notices were issued, and no proceedings were pending before the DRT or other forums to prevent enforcement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Petition ALLOWED. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet appointed an Advocate Commissioner (Mr. J. Rajendiran) to take possession of the mortgaged property from the respondents on behalf of Hinduja Housing Finance Limited under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The respondents defaulted on a home loan of Rs. 14,50,000 after statutory demand and possession notices were issued, and no proceedings were pending before the DRT or other forums to prevent enforcement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts