M/s Grihum Housing Finance Limited vs P Karthikeyan — 239/2025

Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled out of court on 15th April 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRP020004262025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

29-08-2025

Filing Number

426/2025

Filing Date

15-10-2025

Registration No

239/2025

Registration Date

18-11-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ranipet

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled out of court

Acts & Sections

SecuritisationandReconstructionofFinancialAssets&EnforcementofSecurityInterestAct Section Section 14

Petitioner(s)

M/s Grihum Housing Finance Limited

Adv. A Rajavel

Respondent(s)

P Karthikeyan

S Gayathri

Jagadeeshwaran Palani

Amutha Palani

Thiruvarul Prakasam Palani

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet

15-04-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Await Reports

09-03-2026

Orders

26-02-2026

Orders

12-02-2026

Hearing on Sentence

Final Orders / Judgements

15-04-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet dismissed a petition filed by Grihum Housing Finance Limited under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, which sought appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to take possession of mortgaged property and police assistance for eviction. The petition was dismissed as the parties amicably settled the matter out of court, with the petitioner agreeing to pay partial remuneration to the Advocate Commissioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet dismissed a petition filed by Grihum Housing Finance Limited under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, which sought appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to take possession of mortgaged property and police assistance for eviction. The petition was dismissed as the parties amicably settled the matter out of court, with the petitioner agreeing to pay partial remuneration to the Advocate Commissioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ranipet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case