Ms HERO HOUSING FINANCE LTD Represented by its Authorized Officer Mr PaulSamy Yadav vs RAVICHANDRAN M — 249/2025

Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14. Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRP020001222025

Await Reports

Next Hearing

22nd April 2026

e-Filing Number

26-02-2025

Filing Number

122/2025

Filing Date

04-03-2025

Registration No

249/2025

Registration Date

26-11-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ranipet

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet

Acts & Sections

SecuritisationandReconstructionofFinancialAssets&EnforcementofSecurityInterestAct Section 14

Petitioner(s)

Ms HERO HOUSING FINANCE LTD Represented by its Authorized Officer Mr PaulSamy Yadav

Adv. SK Mariyappan

Respondent(s)

RAVICHANDRAN M

RAVICHANDRAN M

KARPAGAM

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet

08-04-2026

Await Reports

30-03-2026

Await Reports

16-03-2026

Await Reports

09-03-2026

Await Reports

07-02-2026

Await Reports

Interim Orders

07-02-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

SUMMARY The petition filed by Hero Housing Finance Ltd under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 for physical possession of a mortgaged property has been allowed. The court appointed Mr. Manjunath (Advocate Commissioner, MS.No.2289/2024) to take possession of the secured asset from the respondents after proper inventory, with police assistance if necessary, and hand it over to the petitioner. The respondents had defaulted on a Rs. 78 lakh mortgage loan, and the petitioner had complied with all statutory notice requirements under the SARFAESI Act before filing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The petition filed by Hero Housing Finance Ltd under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 for physical possession of a mortgaged property has been allowed. The court appointed Mr. Manjunath (Advocate Commissioner, MS.No.2289/2024) to take possession of the secured asset from the respondents after proper inventory, with police assistance if necessary, and hand it over to the petitioner. The respondents had defaulted on a Rs. 78 lakh mortgage loan, and the petitioner had complied with all statutory notice requirements under the SARFAESI Act before filing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ranipet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case