Ms HERO HOUSING FINANCE LTD Represented by its Authorized Officer Mr PaulSamy Yadav vs RAVICHANDRAN M — 249/2025
Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14. Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRP020001222025
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2025
Filing Number
122/2025
Filing Date
04-03-2025
Registration No
249/2025
Registration Date
26-11-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ranipet
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ms HERO HOUSING FINANCE LTD Represented by its Authorized Officer Mr PaulSamy Yadav
Adv. SK Mariyappan
Respondent(s)
RAVICHANDRAN M
RAVICHANDRAN M
KARPAGAM
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 30-03-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 16-03-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 09-03-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 07-02-2026 | Await Reports |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The petition filed by Hero Housing Finance Ltd under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 for physical possession of a mortgaged property has been allowed. The court appointed Mr. Manjunath (Advocate Commissioner, MS.No.2289/2024) to take possession of the secured asset from the respondents after proper inventory, with police assistance if necessary, and hand it over to the petitioner. The respondents had defaulted on a Rs. 78 lakh mortgage loan, and the petitioner had complied with all statutory notice requirements under the SARFAESI Act before filing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The petition filed by Hero Housing Finance Ltd under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 for physical possession of a mortgaged property has been allowed. The court appointed Mr. Manjunath (Advocate Commissioner, MS.No.2289/2024) to take possession of the secured asset from the respondents after proper inventory, with police assistance if necessary, and hand it over to the petitioner. The respondents had defaulted on a Rs. 78 lakh mortgage loan, and the petitioner had complied with all statutory notice requirements under the SARFAESI Act before filing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts