S Dinesh vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARAKKONAM TLAUK PS — 399/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRP010008882026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

545/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

399/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ranipet

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Ranipet

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

74

Police Station

ARAKKONAM TALUK

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S Dinesh

    Adv. GOVERTHANAN RAJAN

  2. 2.V.Abhinaya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARAKKONAM TLAUK PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Court of Ranipet granted anticipatory bail to S. Dinesh and V. Abhinaya for alleged offences of assault and criminal intimidation under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily police check-ins for 30 days, and restrictions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Ranipet

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Principal District Judge, Ranipet

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 399/2026

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court of Ranipet granted anticipatory bail to S. Dinesh and V. Abhinaya for alleged offences of assault and criminal intimidation under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily police check-ins for 30 days, and restrictions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case