Nanthini vs Inspector of Police Arakkonam Taluk PS — 389/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRP010008582026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
526/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
389/2026
Registration Date
03-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Ranipet
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Ranipet
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
67
Police Station
ARAKKONAM TALUK
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nanthini
Adv. GOVERTHANAN RAJAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police Arakkonam Taluk PS (Police Station)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
Summary: The Ranipet Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to Nanthini (A2) in a case involving charges of abetment and assault under BNS 2023, considering that the injured party was discharged from hospital, she had no prior criminal record, and her co-accused husband was already released on bail. The court imposed strict conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, prohibition on tampering with evidence or witnesses, and a non-absconding clause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge, Ranipet
-
06-Mar-2026
For further Proceedings
Principal District Judge, Ranipet
-
03-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 389/2026
Summary: The Ranipet Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to Nanthini (A2) in a case involving charges of abetment and assault under BNS 2023, considering that the injured party was discharged from hospital, she had no prior criminal record, and her co-accused husband was already released on bail. The court imposed strict conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, prohibition on tampering with evidence or witnesses, and a non-absconding clause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts