SARATHKUMAR vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARAKKNOAM TALUK PS — 383/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRP010008552026

Filing Number

523/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

383/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ranipet

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Ranipet

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SARATHKUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARAKKNOAM TALUK PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ranipet dismissed the bail petition of Sarathkumar under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 for offences under the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 and ARMS Act, 1959. The court denied bail considering the serious nature of the charges (possession of a 2-foot patta kathi weapon, causing public annoyance, and threatening passersby), the petitioner's 14 previous criminal cases, flight risk concerns, and the ongoing investigation stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Ranipet

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Principal District Judge, Ranipet

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 383/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ranipet dismissed the bail petition of Sarathkumar under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 for offences under the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 and ARMS Act, 1959. The court denied bail considering the serious nature of the charges (possession of a 2-foot patta kathi weapon, causing public annoyance, and threatening passersby), the petitioner's 14 previous criminal cases, flight risk concerns, and the ongoing investigation stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case