RANI M vs THANTHONI AMMAL L — 96/2019
Case under Specificreliefact Section 37(2),27(C),. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRP010006112019
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
588/2019
Filing Date
28-11-2019
Registration No
96/2019
Registration Date
28-11-2019
Court
Principal District Court, Ranipet
Judge
2-I Additional District Judge, Ranipet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RANI M
Adv. SOLMUTHU AZHAGAN K
RAMACHANDRAN
Adv. SOLMUTHU AZHAGAN K
DILLI RAJA
Adv. SOLMUTHU AZHAGAN K
BANU
Adv. SOLMUTHU AZHAGAN K
Respondent(s)
THANTHONI AMMAL L
SELVAM
MURUGAN
INDIRA
THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER
Hearing History
Judge: 2-I Additional District Judge, Ranipet
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 07-03-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness deposition (PW-1) recorded on 06.04.2026 in a partition suit (OS.No.96/2019) before the I-Additional District Court, Ranipet. The witness testified regarding family property disputes, claiming that her husband died in 2000 and that jointly-held ancestral properties were partitioned in 1993, with her husband receiving Rs. 2 lakhs in lieu of his share. The court accepted the witness's testimony regarding property details, family arrangements, and maintenance of the elderly mother-in-law, with the judge noting no substantive contradictions in the cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness deposition (PW-1) recorded on 06.04.2026 in a partition suit (OS.No.96/2019) before the I-Additional District Court, Ranipet. The witness testified regarding family property disputes, claiming that her husband died in 2000 and that jointly-held ancestral properties were partitioned in 1993, with her husband receiving Rs. 2 lakhs in lieu of his share. The court accepted the witness's testimony regarding property details, family arrangements, and maintenance of the elderly mother-in-law, with the judge noting no substantive contradictions in the cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts