THIRUMURUGAN vs ARCOT MUNICIPALITY COMMISSIONER RANIPET DISTRICT Advocate - SIVAKUMAR S — 4/2019
Case under Specificreliefact Section OR7R1AND2. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 17th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRP010000372019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
34/2019
Filing Date
17-12-2018
Registration No
4/2019
Registration Date
17-12-2018
Court
Principal District Court, Ranipet
Judge
2-I Additional District Judge, Ranipet
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THIRUMURUGAN
Adv. LATHA K
Respondent(s)
ARCOT MUNICIPALITY COMMISSIONER RANIPET DISTRICT Advocate - SIVAKUMAR S
Hearing History
Judge: 2-I Additional District Judge, Ranipet
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 08-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition (not a court judgment) recorded on 23.02.2026 in OS.No.4/2019 before the I-Additional District Court, Ranipet. The witness testifies about a property dispute involving a shop in Arakudi, detailed claims regarding possession, rental payments of ₹1.5 lakhs and ₹1,500, a Writ Petition (W.P.No.5484/2016), and unauthorized demolition of a structure. The witness describes various legal proceedings and High Court interventions regarding property rights and government authority actions, but this is testimony evidence rather than a final court decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition (not a court judgment) recorded on 23.02.2026 in OS.No.4/2019 before the I-Additional District Court, Ranipet. The witness testifies about a property dispute involving a shop in Arakudi, detailed claims regarding possession, rental payments of ₹1.5 lakhs and ₹1,500, a Writ Petition (W.P.No.5484/2016), and unauthorized demolition of a structure. The witness describes various legal proceedings and High Court interventions regarding property rights and government authority actions, but this is testimony evidence rather than a final court decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts