Sathik Ali vs Naseera beevi Advocate - Tr.K.Periyasamy — 83/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,Rule1. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRM160009142022
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
83/2021
Filing Date
29-10-2021
Registration No
83/2021
Registration Date
29-10-2021
Court
District Munsif Court, Thiruvadanai
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sathik Ali
Adv. Tr. M. Vinothkumar
Respondent(s)
Naseera beevi Advocate - Tr.K.Periyasamy
Ajmur Rahman
Adv. Tr.B.Siva
Amjath Ali
Adv. Tr.Muralikannan
Amjath begam
Adv. Tr.B.Siva
Sagubar Ali
Adv. Tr.B.Siva
Kurshiyath begam
Adv. Tr.B.Siva
Hanisha beham
Adv. Tr.B.Siva
Abdul Jappar
Adv. Tr.B.Karthikeyan
Seyathu Ibrahim
Adv. Tr.B.Karthikeyan
Noorullah
Adv. Tr.B.Karthikeyan
District Collector
Adv. APP Gr.I
Tahsildar
Adv. APP Gr.I
Executive Officer
Adv. APP Gr.I
District Regisrar
Adv. APP Gr.I
Sub Registrar
Adv. APP Gr.I
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 28-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this District Munsif Court order (Case No. 83/2021, dated 30.08.2024) from Tiruvannamalai, the court examined witness PW2's cross-examination testimony regarding a disputed deed document given to the 8th defendant. The court found the witness's testimony regarding the loan document, deed cancellation, panchayat proceedings, and his relationship with the plaintiff to be unreliable and contradictory. The court rejected the witness's claims as incorrect and ruled that the testimony cannot be relied upon for establishing the plaintiff's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this District Munsif Court order (Case No. 83/2021, dated 30.08.2024) from Tiruvannamalai, the court examined witness PW2's cross-examination testimony regarding a disputed deed document given to the 8th defendant. The court found the witness's testimony regarding the loan document, deed cancellation, panchayat proceedings, and his relationship with the plaintiff to be unreliable and contradictory. The court rejected the witness's claims as incorrect and ruled that the testimony cannot be relied upon for establishing the plaintiff's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts