Senthooran vs Mathivanan and 2 others Advocate - Ex Parte — 31/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7,Rule 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRM090000342021
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
Filing Number
40/2021
Filing Date
16-07-2021
Registration No
31/2021
Registration Date
06-08-2021
Court
District Munsif Court, Mudhukulathur
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Senthooran
Adv. Thiru Devendra Muniasamy
Respondent(s)
Mathivanan and 2 others Advocate - Ex Parte
Maruthamalai
Adv. Ex Parte
Veluthai
Adv. Mr.M.Dharmar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
The petition filed by the plaintiff under Order 16 Rule 2&3 of CPC to summon a Ramanathapuram District Collector's officer to produce and testify about the SLR (Survey and Land Record) for the suit property has been dismissed. The court held that since the SLR is a public document, its certified copy can be marked as evidence without requiring the government official's testimony, and the petitioner failed to demonstrate steps taken to obtain certified copies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The petition filed by the plaintiff under Order 16 Rule 2&3 of CPC to summon a Ramanathapuram District Collector's officer to produce and testify about the SLR (Survey and Land Record) for the suit property has been dismissed. The court held that since the SLR is a public document, its certified copy can be marked as evidence without requiring the government official's testimony, and the petitioner failed to demonstrate steps taken to obtain certified copies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts