SIP Kamuthi PS vs Muthuramalingam Advocate - Mr.N.Sarathi — 208/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 26th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNRM070049202023
Filing Number
4898/2023
Filing Date
18-Jul-2023
Registration No
208/2023
Registration Date
19-Jul-2023
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kamudhi
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
26-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SIP (Sub-Inspector of Police) Kamuthi PS (Police Station)
Adv. P.M.Muniandi, APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Muthuramalingam Advocate - Mr.N.Sarathi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-May-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Summary of Case 208/2023 Court Decision: The District Magistrate (Criminal) Court at Kamuthi acquitted the accused Muthuramalingam of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 324, and 506(2), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The accused was discharged under Section 248(1) of the CrPC and released immediately; his bail bond was cancelled. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient. The two eyewitnesses (PW1 and PW2) provided contradictory testimonies—one claimed no injury occurred while the other was not present at the incident. Only the investigating officer's testimony remained, which alone could not establish the accused's guilt beyond doubt. The court applied the principle of benefit of doubt in the accused's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-May-2026
Disposed
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-May-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
25-May-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
25-May-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
25-May-2026
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2026
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Jan-2026
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Nov-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Sep-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jul-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Apr-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Nov-2024
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-May-2024
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Feb-2024
Framing of Charges
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Dec-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Nov-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Oct-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Sep-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Aug-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 208/2023
Summary of Case 208/2023 Court Decision: The District Magistrate (Criminal) Court at Kamuthi acquitted the accused Muthuramalingam of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 324, and 506(2), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The accused was discharged under Section 248(1) of the CrPC and released immediately; his bail bond was cancelled. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient. The two eyewitnesses (PW1 and PW2) provided contradictory testimonies—one claimed no injury occurred while the other was not present at the incident. Only the investigating officer's testimony remained, which alone could not establish the accused's guilt beyond doubt. The court applied the principle of benefit of doubt in the accused's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts