Sub-Inspector of Police, Peraiyur PS vs Alagulakshmi and 2 others Advocate - Tr.K.Rameshkannan — 68/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),506(1). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 26th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNRM070019922023

Filing Number

1986/2023

Filing Date

11-Apr-2023

Registration No

68/2023

Registration Date

17-Apr-2023

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kamudhi

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

26-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

43

Police Station

PERAIYOOR P.S

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),506(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sub-Inspector of Police, Peraiyur PS (Police Station)

    Adv. P.M.Muniandi, APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Alagulakshmi and 2 others Advocate - Tr.K.Rameshkannan

  2. 2.Muthupackiyam

    Adv. Tr.K.Rameshkannan-

  3. 3.Krishnaveni

    Adv. Tr.K.Rameshkannan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-May-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The court acquitted all three accused (Alagulakshmi, Muthupackiyam, and Krishnaveni) under IPC sections 294(b) and 506(2), finding the prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt. The judge determined that witness testimony was inconsistent and insufficient to establish the alleged criminal intimidation and abusive language case filed at Peraiyur Police Station in May 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 25-May-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  5. 25-May-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  6. 25-May-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  7. 25-May-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 29-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 06-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 25-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 28-Mar-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 06-Nov-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 10-May-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 05-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 18-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  17. 13-Oct-2023

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 04-Oct-2023

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 22-Aug-2023

    Appearance

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 26-Jul-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 01-Jul-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 25-May-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 17-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 11-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 68/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted all three accused (Alagulakshmi, Muthupackiyam, and Krishnaveni) under IPC sections 294(b) and 506(2), finding the prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt. The judge determined that witness testimony was inconsistent and insufficient to establish the alleged criminal intimidation and abusive language case filed at Peraiyur Police Station in May 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case