T R Seenivasan vs The Superintend of Police — 11/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(3). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM020000312026

e-Filing Number

21-11-2025

Filing Number

31/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

11/2026

Registration Date

06-Jan-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate No II

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.T R Seenivasan

    Adv. Vanniyaraja Vanniyaraja

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Superintend of Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The court dismissed the petitioner's petition seeking FIR registration against the respondents as "not maintainable," finding that the petitioner had previously filed identical allegations before another magistrate court (Cr.M.P. No. 1293/2025) which were dismissed on merits based on a police inquiry report. The court held that refiling the same accusations before a different court without disclosing the previous dismissal constitutes an abuse of the legal process under Section 175(3) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  10. 20-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  11. 06-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petitioner's petition seeking FIR registration against the respondents as "not maintainable," finding that the petitioner had previously filed identical allegations before another magistrate court (Cr.M.P. No. 1293/2025) which were dismissed on merits based on a police inquiry report. The court held that refiling the same accusations before a different court without disclosing the previous dismissal constitutes an abuse of the legal process under Section 175(3) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case