Thippu Sulthan vs S.M.Noor Mohammed — 148/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,Rule1. Disposed: Uncontested--Compromised on 17th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRM010019622025

Case disposed

Filing Number

397/2025

Filing Date

10-06-2025

Registration No

148/2025

Registration Date

08-09-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

2-Additional District Judge

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Compromised

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,Rule1
Ia/4/2026 Classification : Petition to Set-aside Exparte Order or Decree Section Thippu Sulthan

Petitioner(s)

Thippu Sulthan

Adv. Thiru. P.Natarajan

Hyder Ali, through his power agent, Thippu Sulthan

Avuliya Begam, through her power agent, Thippu Sulthan

Respondent(s)

S.M.Noor Mohammed

Jegan Prasath

Kishore

Azhagar Samy

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional District Judge

17-04-2026

Disposed

07-04-2026

Orders

02-04-2026

Appearance

30-03-2026

Written Statement

13-03-2026

Written Statement

Final Orders / Judgements

17-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The Additional District Judge of Ramanathapuram passed a compromise decree settling a property dispute between the plaintiffs (Tippusultan, Haiderali, Avuliyabegum) and the 4th defendant (Azhagarsamy). The parties agreed to divide 19 cents of land, with plaintiffs retaining 8 cents on the northeastern side and selling 8 cents to the defendant, while sharing a 15-foot pathway jointly. The first defendant was exonerated, and the suit was decreed in accordance with the compromise petition filed under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional District Judge of Ramanathapuram passed a compromise decree settling a property dispute between the plaintiffs (Tippusultan, Haiderali, Avuliyabegum) and the 4th defendant (Azhagarsamy). The parties agreed to divide 19 cents of land, with plaintiffs retaining 8 cents on the northeastern side and selling 8 cents to the defendant, while sharing a 15-foot pathway jointly. The first defendant was exonerated, and the suit was decreed in accordance with the compromise petition filed under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case