Thippu Sulthan vs S.M.Noor Mohammed — 148/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,Rule1. Disposed: Uncontested--Compromised on 17th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRM010019622025
Filing Number
397/2025
Filing Date
10-06-2025
Registration No
148/2025
Registration Date
08-09-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram
Judge
2-Additional District Judge
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Compromised
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thippu Sulthan
Adv. Thiru. P.Natarajan
Hyder Ali, through his power agent, Thippu Sulthan
Avuliya Begam, through her power agent, Thippu Sulthan
Respondent(s)
S.M.Noor Mohammed
Jegan Prasath
Kishore
Azhagar Samy
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District Judge
Disposed
Orders
Appearance
Written Statement
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | Orders |
| 02-04-2026 | Appearance |
| 30-03-2026 | Written Statement |
| 13-03-2026 | Written Statement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional District Judge of Ramanathapuram passed a compromise decree settling a property dispute between the plaintiffs (Tippusultan, Haiderali, Avuliyabegum) and the 4th defendant (Azhagarsamy). The parties agreed to divide 19 cents of land, with plaintiffs retaining 8 cents on the northeastern side and selling 8 cents to the defendant, while sharing a 15-foot pathway jointly. The first defendant was exonerated, and the suit was decreed in accordance with the compromise petition filed under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Additional District Judge of Ramanathapuram passed a compromise decree settling a property dispute between the plaintiffs (Tippusultan, Haiderali, Avuliyabegum) and the 4th defendant (Azhagarsamy). The parties agreed to divide 19 cents of land, with plaintiffs retaining 8 cents on the northeastern side and selling 8 cents to the defendant, while sharing a 15-foot pathway jointly. The first defendant was exonerated, and the suit was decreed in accordance with the compromise petition filed under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts