Senthur vs Inspector of police — 446/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM010007712026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
565/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
446/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
58
Police Station
RAMESWARAM TOWN P.S
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Senthur
Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY
Anand endra Anandhamurugan
Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY
Sathish
Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY
Kanivasan endra Kanimurugan
Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY
Respondent(s)
Inspector of police
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram, granted anticipatory bail to four accused (ages 19-20) charged with assault, criminal intimidation, and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 189(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 324(4), and 351(3). The court found the offenses relatively minor given that victims were discharged from hospital, substantial investigation was complete, and the accused had no criminal antecedents, though bail was conditional on executing Rs. 10,000 bonds with sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and non-tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram, granted anticipatory bail to four accused (ages 19-20) charged with assault, criminal intimidation, and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 189(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 324(4), and 351(3). The court found the offenses relatively minor given that victims were discharged from hospital, substantial investigation was complete, and the accused had no criminal antecedents, though bail was conditional on executing Rs. 10,000 bonds with sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and non-tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts