Senthur vs Inspector of police — 446/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM010007712026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

565/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

446/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

58

Police Station

RAMESWARAM TOWN P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Senthur

Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY

Anand endra Anandhamurugan

Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY

Sathish

Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY

Kanivasan endra Kanimurugan

Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY

Respondent(s)

Inspector of police

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

10-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram, granted anticipatory bail to four accused (ages 19-20) charged with assault, criminal intimidation, and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 189(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 324(4), and 351(3). The court found the offenses relatively minor given that victims were discharged from hospital, substantial investigation was complete, and the accused had no criminal antecedents, though bail was conditional on executing Rs. 10,000 bonds with sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and non-tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram, granted anticipatory bail to four accused (ages 19-20) charged with assault, criminal intimidation, and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 189(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 324(4), and 351(3). The court found the offenses relatively minor given that victims were discharged from hospital, substantial investigation was complete, and the accused had no criminal antecedents, though bail was conditional on executing Rs. 10,000 bonds with sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and non-tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case