Senthur vs Inspector of police — 446/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM010007712026

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

565/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

446/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

58

Police Station

RAMESWARAM TOWN P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Senthur

    Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY

  2. 2.Anand endra Anandhamurugan

    Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY

  3. 3.Sathish

    Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY

  4. 4.Kanivasan endra Kanimurugan

    Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram, granted anticipatory bail to four accused (ages 19-20) charged with assault, criminal intimidation, and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 189(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 324(4), and 351(3). The court found the offenses relatively minor given that victims were discharged from hospital, substantial investigation was complete, and the accused had no criminal antecedents, though bail was conditional on executing Rs. 10,000 bonds with sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and non-tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 446/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram, granted anticipatory bail to four accused (ages 19-20) charged with assault, criminal intimidation, and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 189(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 324(4), and 351(3). The court found the offenses relatively minor given that victims were discharged from hospital, substantial investigation was complete, and the accused had no criminal antecedents, though bail was conditional on executing Rs. 10,000 bonds with sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and non-tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case