Jovith Priya vs The inspector of police, Elanjembar police station — 436/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 24th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM010007532026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
550/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
436/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
18
Police Station
Ilamchembur
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jovith Priya
Adv. Thiru. M.Vadivelu
Respondent(s)
The inspector of police, Elanjembar police station
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 18-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 13-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 10-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram, granted anticipatory bail to Jovith Priya (Accused No. 2) in a case involving alleged assault with a sickle causing injuries. The court found that the injured person was discharged from hospital, major investigation was complete, and the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, justifying bail with conditions including a ₹10,000 bond, twice-daily police reporting for one month, and restrictions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram, granted anticipatory bail to Jovith Priya (Accused No. 2) in a case involving alleged assault with a sickle causing injuries. The court found that the injured person was discharged from hospital, major investigation was complete, and the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, justifying bail with conditions including a ₹10,000 bond, twice-daily police reporting for one month, and restrictions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts