Subbulakshmi vs Ramakrishnan Advocate - Venkatesh V — 100135/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37(2),27(c). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNPD170002972021

Filing Number

100135/2021

Filing Date

07-Oct-2021

Registration No

100135/2021

Registration Date

07-Oct-2021

Court

Sub Court, Keeranur

Judge

1-Sub Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 37(2),27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Subbulakshmi

    Adv. Umashankar. N

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramakrishnan Advocate - Venkatesh V

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgementView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY The court dismissed Subbulakshmi's partition suit against Ramakrishnan (defendant 1) regarding a property in Keeranur village. The petitioner claimed a 1/3 share in the ancestral property (Thawa Sathhu), but the court found that the property belonged solely to Ramakrishnan. The suit was barred by limitation—the petitioner waited 35 years after her father's death (1986) to file the partition claim in 2021, exceeding the 12-year statutory period for adverse possession claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sub Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Sub Judge

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Sub Judge

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  9. 04-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  11. 20-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  12. 07-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  13. 10-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  14. 02-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  15. 25-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  16. 18-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  17. 11-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  18. 03-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  19. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  20. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  21. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  22. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  23. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  24. 20-Aug-2025

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  25. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  26. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  27. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  28. 22-Jul-2025

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  29. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  30. 14-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  31. 08-Jul-2025

    Orders

    Sub Judge

  32. 30-Jun-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Sub Judge

  33. 27-Jun-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Sub Judge

  34. 25-Jun-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Sub Judge

  35. 23-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  36. 16-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  37. 09-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  38. 28-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  39. 01-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  40. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  41. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  42. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  43. 12-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  44. 29-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  45. 22-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  46. 10-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  47. 20-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  48. 11-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  49. 21-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  50. 25-Sep-2024

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  51. 25-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  52. 11-Sep-2024

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  53. 11-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  54. 28-Aug-2024

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  55. 28-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  56. 12-Aug-2024

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  57. 12-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  58. 05-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Sub Judge

  59. 01-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Sub Judge

  60. 26-Jun-2024

    Issues

    Sub Judge

  61. 26-Jun-2024

    Restored

    Sub Judge

  62. 26-Jun-2024

    Trial

    Sub Judge

  63. 23-Nov-2022

    Disposed

    Sub Judge

  64. 18-Nov-2022

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  65. 11-Nov-2022

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  66. 11-Oct-2022

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  67. 26-Sep-2022

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  68. 20-Sep-2022

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  69. 16-Sep-2022

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  70. 14-Sep-2022

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  71. 09-Sep-2022

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  72. 08-Sep-2022

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  73. 03-Sep-2022

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  74. 01-Sep-2022

    Judgement

    Sub Judge

  75. 26-Aug-2022

    Judgement

    Sub Judge

  76. 24-Aug-2022

    Judgement

    Sub Judge

  77. 18-Aug-2022

    Judgement

    Sub Judge

  78. 12-Aug-2022

    Judgement

    Sub Judge

  79. 08-Aug-2022

    Judgement

    Sub Judge

  80. 01-Aug-2022

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  81. 25-Jul-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge

  82. 13-Jul-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge

  83. 07-Jul-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge

  84. 01-Jul-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge

  85. 28-Jun-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge

  86. 20-Jun-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge

  87. 08-Jun-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge

  88. 06-Apr-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

  89. 25-Mar-2022

    Written Statement

  90. 24-Feb-2022

    Written Statement

  91. 19-Jan-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  92. 07-Oct-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100135/2021

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY The court dismissed Subbulakshmi's partition suit against Ramakrishnan (defendant 1) regarding a property in Keeranur village. The petitioner claimed a 1/3 share in the ancestral property (Thawa Sathhu), but the court found that the property belonged solely to Ramakrishnan. The suit was barred by limitation—the petitioner waited 35 years after her father's death (1986) to file the partition claim in 2021, exceeding the 12-year statutory period for adverse possession claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case