Rakavi vs Inspector of Police,Vallathirakottai police Station, Crime No.16/2026 — 703/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),296(b),118(1),351(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPD010012692026

Filing Number

999/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

703/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Pudukkottai

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

20

Police Station

Vallathirakottai

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),296(b),118(1),351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rakavi

    Adv. Ramaraj.P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police,Vallathirakottai police Station, Crime No.16/2026

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai granted anticipatory bail to Ragavi (2nd accused) in Criminal Case No. 20/2026 involving charges under BNS sections 191(2), 296(b), 118(1), and 351(2) for quarreling, using abusive language, and causing injury to the complainant. The court found that the material investigation was substantially complete and the injured party had been discharged, justifying bail with strict conditions including a Rs. 20,000 bond with two sureties, daily reporting for two months, and surrender within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 703/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai granted anticipatory bail to Ragavi (2nd accused) in Criminal Case No. 20/2026 involving charges under BNS sections 191(2), 296(b), 118(1), and 351(2) for quarreling, using abusive language, and causing injury to the complainant. The court found that the material investigation was substantially complete and the injured party had been discharged, justifying bail with strict conditions including a Rs. 20,000 bond with two sureties, daily reporting for two months, and surrender within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case