Sapthagirivasan vs Inspector of Police, Keeramangalam Police Station, Crime No. 44/2026 — 699/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),118(1),351(3),310(2),311. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPD010012662026
Filing Number
996/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
699/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Pudukkottai
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 04-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
44
Police Station
Keeramangalam.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sapthagirivasan
Adv. Karuppaiah A
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police, Keeramangalam Police Station, Crime No. 44/2026
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai, dismissed the bail petition of Sabthagirivasan, who is accused of serious offenses including attempted murder, causing injuries with weapons, robbery, and criminal intimidation in connection with a March 3, 2026 incident. The court rejected bail considering the grave nature of the charges, the victim still undergoing treatment, the preliminary stage of investigation, and strong prosecution objections, determining that release at this stage was undesirable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 699/2026
The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai, dismissed the bail petition of Sabthagirivasan, who is accused of serious offenses including attempted murder, causing injuries with weapons, robbery, and criminal intimidation in connection with a March 3, 2026 incident. The court rejected bail considering the grave nature of the charges, the victim still undergoing treatment, the preliminary stage of investigation, and strong prosecution objections, determining that release at this stage was undesirable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts