Annapurani vs Inspector of Police, Vallathirakottai Police Station, Crime No. 20/2026 — 632/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),296(b),118(1),351(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPD010011322026

Filing Number

893/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

632/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Pudukkottai

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

Vallathirakottai

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),296(b),118(1),351(2)

Petitioner(s)

1.Annapurani

Adv. Ramaraj.P

Respondent(s)

1.Inspector of Police, Vallathirakottai Police Station, Crime No. 20/2026

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
07-Mar-2026

Copy of OrderView PDF

The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed Annapoorani's anticipatory bail petition, finding that the serious nature of charges (assault with a stick causing injury), the victim's ongoing hospitalization, incomplete investigation, and strong prosecution objections warranted denial at this stage. The court applied Supreme Court precedent emphasizing that the seriousness of charges, witness tampering risks, and public interest are key considerations in anticipatory bail decisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
07-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal District Judge
04-Mar-2026

Issue of Service

Principal District Judge
03-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
02-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 632/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed Annapoorani's anticipatory bail petition, finding that the serious nature of charges (assault with a stick causing injury), the victim's ongoing hospitalization, incomplete investigation, and strong prosecution objections warranted denial at this stage. The court applied Supreme Court precedent emphasizing that the seriousness of charges, witness tampering risks, and public interest are key considerations in anticipatory bail decisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.