Rajendiran vs Inspector of Police,Nagudi Police Station Crime No.23/2026 — 618/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPD010011092026
Filing Number
872/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
618/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Pudukkottai
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 04-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
23
Police Station
Nagudi.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rajendiran
Adv. Chelladurai R.P
-
2.Satthaya
-
3.Mutthaya
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police,Nagudi Police Station Crime No.23/2026
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by three accused persons (Rajendran, Sathaiah, and Muthaiah) charged with criminal offences under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) for a quarrel on 06.02.2026 where they allegedly used abusive language, caused injuries, and threatened to kill the complainant and his wife. The court found the charges serious, noted that the injured persons were still hospitalized, investigation was pending, and no change in circumstances justified granting bail after the previous dismissal on 13.02.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 618/2026
The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by three accused persons (Rajendran, Sathaiah, and Muthaiah) charged with criminal offences under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) for a quarrel on 06.02.2026 where they allegedly used abusive language, caused injuries, and threatened to kill the complainant and his wife. The court found the charges serious, noted that the injured persons were still hospitalized, investigation was pending, and no change in circumstances justified granting bail after the previous dismissal on 13.02.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts