Sakthivel vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Mangalamedu PS — 131/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPB090004022026

Filing Number

380/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

131/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kunnam

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Kunnam

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

119

Police Station

POLICE STATION, MANGALAMADU, PERMBALUR.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sakthivel

    Adv. K.N. RAMASAMY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Mangalamedu PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Kunnam granted bail to Sakthivel @ Sivasakthi, who was arrested on charges under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 127(2), 118(1), and 351(3). The court allowed the bail petition after the petitioner had spent 11 days in judicial custody and considering the victim's discharge from hospital, imposing conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 15 days, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Kunnam

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Notice

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Kunnam

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 131/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Kunnam granted bail to Sakthivel @ Sivasakthi, who was arrested on charges under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 127(2), 118(1), and 351(3). The court allowed the bail petition after the petitioner had spent 11 days in judicial custody and considering the victim's discharge from hospital, imposing conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 15 days, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case