Rathinavel vs Maruthai Advocate - S. ARUNAN, M.Sc., B.L., — 25/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7 R1. Status: Mediation. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNPB060002492022
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
Filing Number
26/2022
Filing Date
29-03-2022
Registration No
25/2022
Registration Date
29-03-2022
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Veppanthattai
Judge
11-DISTRICT MUNSIF-CUM-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VEPPANTHATTAI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rathinavel
Adv. E. RAMALINGAM, B.Sc., B.L.,
Azhagammal
Adv. E. RAMALINGAM, B.Sc., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Maruthai Advocate - S. ARUNAN, M.Sc., B.L.,
Kasthuri
Adv. S. ARUNAN, M.Sc., B.L.,
Ramesh
Jeyalakshmi
Adv. S. ARUNAN, M.Sc., B.L.,
Kandasamy
Adv. S. ARUNAN, M.Sc., B.L.,
The Village Administrative Officer, Thevaiyur
Adv. THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER, PDC, PERAMBALUR
Revenue Regioner Officer
Adv. THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER, PDC, PERAMBALUR
The Revenue Officer
Adv. THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER, PDC, PERAMBALUR
The District Collector, Perambalur
Adv. THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER, PDC, PERAMBALUR
The Sub Registrar, Valikandapuram village
Adv. THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER, PDC, PERAMBALUR
The Panchayat Board President
Hearing History
Judge: 11-DISTRICT MUNSIF-CUM-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VEPPANTHATTAI.
Mediation
Mediation
Mediation
Mediation
Mediation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Mediation |
| 16-02-2026 | Mediation |
| 17-12-2025 | Mediation |
| 22-10-2025 | Mediation |
| 28-07-2025 | Mediation |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The District Munsif Court at Vepanthattai (Tamil Nadu) dismissed the petition seeking appointment of a court commissioner to survey disputed land property. The court held that possession of property in an injunction suit must be decided based on evidence presented by parties, not delegated to a commissioner, relying on precedent law (CPC Section 75 and AIR 1996 Kar 257). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The District Munsif Court at Vepanthattai (Tamil Nadu) dismissed the petition seeking appointment of a court commissioner to survey disputed land property. The court held that possession of property in an injunction suit must be decided based on evidence presented by parties, not delegated to a commissioner, relying on precedent law (CPC Section 75 and AIR 1996 Kar 257). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts