Ranjitha vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR — 266/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPB010004302026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
294/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
266/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Perambalur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
39
Police Station
POLICE STATION, V. KALATHUR, PERAMBALUR.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ranjitha
Adv. PANNER SELVAM P
Mani Alice Amaravathi
Adv. PANNER SELVAM P
Respondent(s)
State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police V.Kalathur PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PDC PERAMBALUR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 07-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur, granted anticipatory bail to the two accused petitioners (Ranjitha and Mani) in a family dispute case involving alleged assault under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 74, and 351(2). The court found that the injured party was discharged from hospital, co-accused were already released on bail, there were no prior criminal records against the petitioners, and no serious overt acts were attributed to them. The bail was granted on conditions including Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties each, daily police reporting for 3 weeks, surrender within 15 days, and prohibitions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur, granted anticipatory bail to the two accused petitioners (Ranjitha and Mani) in a family dispute case involving alleged assault under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 74, and 351(2). The court found that the injured party was discharged from hospital, co-accused were already released on bail, there were no prior criminal records against the petitioners, and no serious overt acts were attributed to them. The bail was granted on conditions including Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties each, daily police reporting for 3 weeks, surrender within 15 days, and prohibitions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts