Muthusamy vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Mangalamedu PS Advocate - THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MAHILA COURT PERAMBALUR — 238/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPB010003922026
Filing Number
268/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
238/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Perambalur
Judge
2-Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 18-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Muthusamy
Adv. G. KUMARAVELAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Inspector of Police Mangalamedu PS (Police Station) Advocate - THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MAHILA COURT PERAMBALUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
The Sessions Judge granted bail to the accused Muthusamy, charged under COTPA Act 2003 and Juvenile Justice Act 2015 for allegedly selling tobacco and gutka products to minors, considering he had been in judicial custody for 15 days and the investigation period was likely complete. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, address verification, and prohibition from leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.
-
06-Mar-2026
Await Reports
Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.
-
04-Mar-2026
Await Reports
Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur.
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 238/2026
The Sessions Judge granted bail to the accused Muthusamy, charged under COTPA Act 2003 and Juvenile Justice Act 2015 for allegedly selling tobacco and gutka products to minors, considering he had been in judicial custody for 15 days and the investigation period was likely complete. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, address verification, and prohibition from leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts