State Government Sub Inspector Of Police PEW Namakkal vs Duraisamy Advocate - Akilan.A — 43/2025

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 01st July 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNNM140001872025

e-Filing Number

24-03-2025

Filing Number

187/2025

Filing Date

24-Mar-2025

Registration No

43/2025

Registration Date

24-Mar-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sendamangalam

Judge

28-Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

Decision Date

01-Jul-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

541

Police Station

PEW Namakkal P.S

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government Sub Inspector Of Police PEW Namakkal

    Adv. Additional Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Duraisamy Advocate - Akilan.A

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jul-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 43/2025 Court: Judicial Magistrate Court, Sendamangalam Judgment Date: 01.07.2026 Charge: Illegal possession and sale of alcohol under Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act (TNP Act) sections 4(1)(C) r/w 4(1)(a), 1937 Accused: Duraisamy (Palanigounder), approximately 60 years old Key Facts: On 15.09.2024, police found the accused near his residence with liquor bottles and recovered approximately 30 bottles of Express Brandy (180 ML) hidden near his house. The accused allegedly confessed to purchasing alcohol at reduced official rates and reselling it at higher prices illegally. Court's Decision: The court acquitted the accused and gave him the benefit of doubt under BNSS Section 271(1). The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key deficiencies included: the accused's confession couldn't be used against him without corroborating evidence; no chemical analysis confirmed the bottles contained alcohol; witnesses testified only about recovery procedures, not about actual sales; and the investigation lacked proper procedure with only police witnesses and no civilian corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jul-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  4. 25-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  5. 24-Jun-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  6. 24-Jun-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  7. 23-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  8. 19-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  9. 15-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  10. 04-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  11. 26-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  12. 22-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  13. 14-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  14. 07-May-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  15. 07-May-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  16. 07-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  17. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  18. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  19. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  20. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  21. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  22. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  23. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  24. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  25. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  26. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  27. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  28. 12-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  29. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  30. 11-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  31. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  32. 06-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  33. 13-Oct-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  34. 11-Sep-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  35. 11-Aug-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  36. 11-Jul-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  37. 18-Jun-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  38. 10-Jun-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  39. 16-May-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  40. 29-Apr-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Sendamangalam

  41. 24-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 24-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 43/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 43/2025 Court: Judicial Magistrate Court, Sendamangalam Judgment Date: 01.07.2026 Charge: Illegal possession and sale of alcohol under Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act (TNP Act) sections 4(1)(C) r/w 4(1)(a), 1937 Accused: Duraisamy (Palanigounder), approximately 60 years old Key Facts: On 15.09.2024, police found the accused near his residence with liquor bottles and recovered approximately 30 bottles of Express Brandy (180 ML) hidden near his house. The accused allegedly confessed to purchasing alcohol at reduced official rates and reselling it at higher prices illegally. Court's Decision: The court acquitted the accused and gave him the benefit of doubt under BNSS Section 271(1). The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key deficiencies included: the accused's confession couldn't be used against him without corroborating evidence; no chemical analysis confirmed the bottles contained alcohol; witnesses testified only about recovery procedures, not about actual sales; and the investigation lacked proper procedure with only police witnesses and no civilian corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case