The Inspector of Police, Perambur vs Anantharaj — 253/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 118(1), 74, 351(3). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 02nd April 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMY090020922025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

29-11-2025

Filing Number

1937/2025

Filing Date

11-12-2025

Registration No

253/2025

Registration Date

24-12-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

414

Police Station

Perambur Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 118(1), 74, 351(3)

Petitioner(s)

The Inspector of Police, Perambur

Adv. PERAMBUR POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

Anantharaj

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi

02-04-2026

Disposed

01-04-2026

Judgement

27-03-2026

Questioning

24-03-2026

Part Heard

10-03-2026

Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Court Decision Summary The District Criminal Court in Tarangambadi acquitted the defendant of charges under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), 74, and 351(3) (causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and endangering life). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the government witnesses (particularly witness 1) contradicted the complaint allegations and later reconciled with the defendant, undermining case credibility. The court applied the benefit of doubt to the accused and ordered his release under section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The District Criminal Court in Tarangambadi acquitted the defendant of charges under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), 74, and 351(3) (causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and endangering life). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the government witnesses (particularly witness 1) contradicted the complaint allegations and later reconciled with the defendant, undermining case credibility. The court applied the benefit of doubt to the accused and ordered his release under section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case