Inspector of Police, Sembanarkoil vs PANDIYAN — 238/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304(A). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNMY090019232025
e-Filing Number
26-11-2025
Filing Number
1773/2025
Filing Date
26-11-2025
Registration No
238/2025
Registration Date
26-11-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
97
Police Station
sembanarkoil Police Station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Sembanarkoil
Adv. Sembanorkoil PS
Respondent(s)
PANDIYAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Part Heard
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 04-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 03-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Sessions Court in Tarangambadi acquitted the accused under IPC Section 304-A (causing death by negligence) in a case involving a fatal vehicle collision on March 4, 2020. The court found that while the government witnesses established that a death occurred and injuries were sustained, they failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove recklessly or negligently; the government's own witnesses testified they had no knowledge of the incident, and critical eyewitness evidence was compromised. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The District Sessions Court in Tarangambadi acquitted the accused under IPC Section 304-A (causing death by negligence) in a case involving a fatal vehicle collision on March 4, 2020. The court found that while the government witnesses established that a death occurred and injuries were sustained, they failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove recklessly or negligently; the government's own witnesses testified they had no knowledge of the incident, and critical eyewitness evidence was compromised. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts