Inspector of Police, Kuthlam vs Sathish — 221/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(ii)IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 26th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMY020063342024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

18-11-2024

Filing Number

6292/2024

Filing Date

20-11-2024

Registration No

221/2024

Registration Date

21-11-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

6-Judicial Magistrate No.1

Decision Date

26th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 294(b),324,506(ii)IPC

Petitioner(s)

Inspector of Police, Kuthlam

Adv. Kuthalam PS

Respondent(s)

Sathish

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Judicial Magistrate No.1

26-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

Judgement

13-03-2026

Questioning

10-03-2026

Part Heard

06-03-2026

Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

26-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Mayiladuthurai acquitted four accused persons (Sathish, Mahesh, Susheraj, and Ravi) of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 324, and 506(ii) filed in connection with a January 21, 2023 assault case. The court found that while the complainant and eyewitness testified inconsistently and contradicted their initial statements, the prosecution's case relied solely on an investigating officer's testimony without corroborating evidence from the government case. Since the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt was not satisfied, the court invoked the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused and ordered their acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Mayiladuthurai acquitted four accused persons (Sathish, Mahesh, Susheraj, and Ravi) of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 324, and 506(ii) filed in connection with a January 21, 2023 assault case. The court found that while the complainant and eyewitness testified inconsistently and contradicted their initial statements, the prosecution's case relied solely on an investigating officer's testimony without corroborating evidence from the government case. Since the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt was not satisfied, the court invoked the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused and ordered their acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Mayiladuthurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case