Inspector of Police, Kuthlam vs Sathish — 221/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(ii)IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 26th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNMY020063342024
e-Filing Number
18-11-2024
Filing Number
6292/2024
Filing Date
20-11-2024
Registration No
221/2024
Registration Date
21-11-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Mayiladuthurai
Judge
6-Judicial Magistrate No.1
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Kuthlam
Adv. Kuthalam PS
Respondent(s)
Sathish
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Judicial Magistrate No.1
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 13-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 10-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 06-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Mayiladuthurai acquitted four accused persons (Sathish, Mahesh, Susheraj, and Ravi) of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 324, and 506(ii) filed in connection with a January 21, 2023 assault case. The court found that while the complainant and eyewitness testified inconsistently and contradicted their initial statements, the prosecution's case relied solely on an investigating officer's testimony without corroborating evidence from the government case. Since the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt was not satisfied, the court invoked the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused and ordered their acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Mayiladuthurai acquitted four accused persons (Sathish, Mahesh, Susheraj, and Ravi) of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 324, and 506(ii) filed in connection with a January 21, 2023 assault case. The court found that while the complainant and eyewitness testified inconsistently and contradicted their initial statements, the prosecution's case relied solely on an investigating officer's testimony without corroborating evidence from the government case. Since the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt was not satisfied, the court invoked the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused and ordered their acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts