M/s Equitas Small Finance Bank Ltd Mayiladuthurai rep by its authorised signatory Suryakumar vs K Vadivel — 3074/2025
Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14. Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMY020052322025
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
19-11-2025
Filing Number
5220/2025
Filing Date
28-11-2025
Registration No
3074/2025
Registration Date
28-11-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Mayiladuthurai
Judge
9-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/s Equitas Small Finance Bank Ltd Mayiladuthurai rep by its authorised signatory Suryakumar
Adv. Manoj Kumar M
Respondent(s)
K Vadivel
Intharani
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
Orders
Appearance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 27-02-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 19-01-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 09-01-2026 | Orders | |
| 02-01-2026 | Appearance |
Interim Orders
This document appears to be a witness examination record from a SARFAESI Act case involving a loan dispute, where witness P.W.1 (S. Surya Kumar) was sworn in and affirmed the truth of his statement. Multiple exhibits including loan documents, demand notices, and possession notices under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 were marked and admitted into evidence. No specific order (bail granted/denied, petition allowed/dismissed) is evident in this excerpt—it records testimony and evidence marking only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document appears to be a witness examination record from a SARFAESI Act case involving a loan dispute, where witness P.W.1 (S. Surya Kumar) was sworn in and affirmed the truth of his statement. Multiple exhibits including loan documents, demand notices, and possession notices under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 were marked and admitted into evidence. No specific order (bail granted/denied, petition allowed/dismissed) is evident in this excerpt—it records testimony and evidence marking only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts