Inspector Of Police Manalmedu vs Thangadurai — 185/2025

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(c). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th April 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMY020032652025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-08-2025

Filing Number

3262/2025

Filing Date

09-08-2025

Registration No

185/2025

Registration Date

11-08-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

6-Judicial Magistrate No.1

Decision Date

16th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Acts & Sections

TN PROHIBITION ACT Section 4(1)(c)

Petitioner(s)

Inspector Of Police Manalmedu

Respondent(s)

Thangadurai

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Judicial Magistrate No.1

16-04-2026

Disposed

08-04-2026

Judgement

27-03-2026

Questioning

24-03-2026

Part Heard

10-03-2026

Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

16-04-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court of Mayiladuthurai acquitted the accused of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that 26 bottles of Tasmac liquor were seized from the accused's possession. The court identified critical gaps in evidence, including: (1) lack of independent witness testimony to corroborate the seizure; (2) failure to follow proper procedures regarding destruction of seized contraband as per Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act Section 32(C) and judicial precedent; and (3) inconsistencies in the police witnesses' accounts regarding the exact location and circumstances of seizure. The accused was accordingly acquitted and released under Section 248(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court of Mayiladuthurai acquitted the accused of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that 26 bottles of Tasmac liquor were seized from the accused's possession. The court identified critical gaps in evidence, including: (1) lack of independent witness testimony to corroborate the seizure; (2) failure to follow proper procedures regarding destruction of seized contraband as per Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act Section 32(C) and judicial precedent; and (3) inconsistencies in the police witnesses' accounts regarding the exact location and circumstances of seizure. The accused was accordingly acquitted and released under Section 248(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Mayiladuthurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case