Inspector Of Police Manalmedu vs Thangadurai — 185/2025
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(c). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNMY020032652025
e-Filing Number
07-08-2025
Filing Number
3262/2025
Filing Date
09-08-2025
Registration No
185/2025
Registration Date
11-08-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Mayiladuthurai
Judge
6-Judicial Magistrate No.1
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector Of Police Manalmedu
Respondent(s)
Thangadurai
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Judicial Magistrate No.1
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 08-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 27-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 24-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court of Mayiladuthurai acquitted the accused of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that 26 bottles of Tasmac liquor were seized from the accused's possession. The court identified critical gaps in evidence, including: (1) lack of independent witness testimony to corroborate the seizure; (2) failure to follow proper procedures regarding destruction of seized contraband as per Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act Section 32(C) and judicial precedent; and (3) inconsistencies in the police witnesses' accounts regarding the exact location and circumstances of seizure. The accused was accordingly acquitted and released under Section 248(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court of Mayiladuthurai acquitted the accused of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that 26 bottles of Tasmac liquor were seized from the accused's possession. The court identified critical gaps in evidence, including: (1) lack of independent witness testimony to corroborate the seizure; (2) failure to follow proper procedures regarding destruction of seized contraband as per Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act Section 32(C) and judicial precedent; and (3) inconsistencies in the police witnesses' accounts regarding the exact location and circumstances of seizure. The accused was accordingly acquitted and released under Section 248(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts