State Bank of India, Mayiladuthurai vs A. Anbalagan proprietor, sri kumaran pathiram furnitures, Mayiladuthurai. — 105/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.34 R.1,2. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMY010036402024

Filing Number

633/2024

Filing Date

14-Oct-2024

Registration No

105/2024

Registration Date

28-Oct-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.34 R.1,2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Bank of India, Mayiladuthurai

    Adv. Dr. R. Seyon

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A. Anbalagan proprietor, sri kumaran pathiram furnitures, Mayiladuthurai.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Summary: The District Court of Mayiladuthurai decreed the suit in favor of State Bank of India against A. Anbalagan for recovery of Rs. 10,24,975/- (principal of Rs. 10,00,000/- plus accrued interest) on a loan sanctioned under the Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana Scheme in 2018. The court found the defendant liable based on the loan application, hypothecation agreement, and account statements presented by the plaintiff, as the defendant failed to repay the amount and did not contest the suit after being set exparte. The defendant was directed to repay the amount with interest at 13.25% per annum until the decree date, and 6% per annum thereafter until full realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  8. 16-Dec-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  9. 18-Nov-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  10. 07-Oct-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  11. 23-Sep-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  12. 09-Sep-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  13. 08-Jul-2025

    Steps

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  14. 05-Jun-2025

    Steps

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  15. 22-Apr-2025

    Steps

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  16. 15-Apr-2025

    Steps

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  17. 25-Mar-2025

    Steps

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  18. 13-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  19. 18-Feb-2025

    Issue of Service

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  20. 09-Jan-2025

    Issue of Service

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  21. 16-Dec-2024

    Issue of Service

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  22. 25-Nov-2024

    Issue of Service

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  23. 28-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 14-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 105/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Court of Mayiladuthurai decreed the suit in favor of State Bank of India against A. Anbalagan for recovery of Rs. 10,24,975/- (principal of Rs. 10,00,000/- plus accrued interest) on a loan sanctioned under the Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana Scheme in 2018. The court found the defendant liable based on the loan application, hypothecation agreement, and account statements presented by the plaintiff, as the defendant failed to repay the amount and did not contest the suit after being set exparte. The defendant was directed to repay the amount with interest at 13.25% per annum until the decree date, and 6% per annum thereafter until full realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case