Mugilan vs Inspector of Police, Aanaikkaranchathiram — 363/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMY010006802026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
532/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
363/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai
Judge
8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
96
Police Station
Annaikaranchathiram P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mugilan
Adv. Rathakrishnan R
-
2.Jagadesh
Adv. Rathakrishnan R
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police, Aanaikkaranchathiram
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
The District and Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Mukilan and Jagadeesh, accused of offenses under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) arising from a March 6, 2026 incident involving alleged verbal abuse, knife assault, and criminal intimidation. The court found no injured parties, no prior cases against the petitioners, and noted the co-accused was already bailed, warranting pre-arrest bail on Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties and conditions including daily police reporting for 30 days and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
-
17-Mar-2026
Service Pending
District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
-
16-Mar-2026
Service Pending
District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 363/2026
The District and Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Mukilan and Jagadeesh, accused of offenses under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) arising from a March 6, 2026 incident involving alleged verbal abuse, knife assault, and criminal intimidation. The court found no injured parties, no prior cases against the petitioners, and noted the co-accused was already bailed, warranting pre-arrest bail on Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties and conditions including daily police reporting for 30 days and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts