C.O.Pandi and one another vs Jeyakodi and one another — 7/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(d). Status: Stay. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

AS - Appeal Suit

CNR: TNMD240005162024

Stay

Next Hearing

06th July 2026

Filing Number

504/2024

Filing Date

02-12-2024

Registration No

7/2024

Registration Date

02-12-2024

Court

Sub Court, Usilampatti

Judge

3-Sub Judge, Usilampatti

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 25(d)

Petitioner(s)

C.O.Pandi and one another

Adv. JEYACHANDRAN K

M.Victoria

Respondent(s)

Jeyakodi and one another

Periyakaruppan

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Sub Judge, Usilampatti

20-04-2026

Stay

16-03-2026

For further Proceedings

26-02-2026

For further Proceedings

29-01-2026

For further Proceedings

10-12-2025

For further Proceedings

Interim Orders

10-12-2025
Copy of Judgment/Order

Summary The court allowed an interlocutory application (I.A. No. 1/2025) filed under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC by appellants C.O. Pandi and M. Victoria to file additional documents in their appeal (A.S. 7/2024). The court permitted the appellants to file three property documents in the name of Periyakaruppan (a respondent's ancestor): a patta (deed), pasaali (tax record), and arinkal (partition document). The court found that allowing these documents was necessary to establish the appellants' case regarding property ownership and to determine whether the trial court's judgment was justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed an interlocutory application (I.A. No. 1/2025) filed under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC by appellants C.O. Pandi and M. Victoria to file additional documents in their appeal (A.S. 7/2024). The court permitted the appellants to file three property documents in the name of Periyakaruppan (a respondent's ancestor): a patta (deed), pasaali (tax record), and arinkal (partition document). The court found that allowing these documents was necessary to establish the appellants' case regarding property ownership and to determine whether the trial court's judgment was justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Usilampatti All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case