C.O.Pandi and one another vs Jeyakodi and one another — 7/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(d). Status: Stay. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
AS - Appeal Suit
CNR: TNMD240005162024
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
Filing Number
504/2024
Filing Date
02-12-2024
Registration No
7/2024
Registration Date
02-12-2024
Court
Sub Court, Usilampatti
Judge
3-Sub Judge, Usilampatti
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
C.O.Pandi and one another
Adv. JEYACHANDRAN K
M.Victoria
Respondent(s)
Jeyakodi and one another
Periyakaruppan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Sub Judge, Usilampatti
Stay
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Stay |
| 16-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 26-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 29-01-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 10-12-2025 | For further Proceedings |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed an interlocutory application (I.A. No. 1/2025) filed under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC by appellants C.O. Pandi and M. Victoria to file additional documents in their appeal (A.S. 7/2024). The court permitted the appellants to file three property documents in the name of Periyakaruppan (a respondent's ancestor): a patta (deed), pasaali (tax record), and arinkal (partition document). The court found that allowing these documents was necessary to establish the appellants' case regarding property ownership and to determine whether the trial court's judgment was justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed an interlocutory application (I.A. No. 1/2025) filed under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC by appellants C.O. Pandi and M. Victoria to file additional documents in their appeal (A.S. 7/2024). The court permitted the appellants to file three property documents in the name of Periyakaruppan (a respondent's ancestor): a patta (deed), pasaali (tax record), and arinkal (partition document). The court found that allowing these documents was necessary to establish the appellants' case regarding property ownership and to determine whether the trial court's judgment was justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts