M. Kannan vs K. Chinnakathi — 302/2021
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O 7 R 1. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 09th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD230005162021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
490/2021
Filing Date
16-07-2021
Registration No
302/2021
Registration Date
22-09-2021
Court
Sub Court, Melur
Judge
2-Sub Judge, Melur
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M. Kannan
Adv. R.Vellachi
Respondent(s)
K. Chinnakathi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Sub Judge, Melur
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 02-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 23-02-2026 | Judgement | |
| 16-02-2026 | Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Subordinate Court of Melur decreed a suit for specific performance of a property sale contract dated 27.07.2015. The court ordered the defendant to execute and register a sale deed in favor of the plaintiff upon receiving the balance consideration of Rs. 50,000, and deliver possession within two months, with a permanent injunction preventing the defendant from alienating the property to third parties. The defendant's absence and default, combined with the plaintiff's documentary evidence of the agreement and payment of Rs. 6,00,000 advance, led the court to accept the plaintiff's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Subordinate Court of Melur decreed a suit for specific performance of a property sale contract dated 27.07.2015. The court ordered the defendant to execute and register a sale deed in favor of the plaintiff upon receiving the balance consideration of Rs. 50,000, and deliver possession within two months, with a permanent injunction preventing the defendant from alienating the property to third parties. The defendant's absence and default, combined with the plaintiff's documentary evidence of the agreement and payment of Rs. 6,00,000 advance, led the court to accept the plaintiff's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts