Muruga Ganesan vs Pitchai and 4 others — 222/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or 6 R 14a. Status: Counter. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD230004112021
Filing Number
387/2021
Filing Date
21-Apr-2021
Registration No
222/2021
Registration Date
18-Aug-2021
Court
Sub Court, Melur
Judge
2-Sub Judge, Melur
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Muruga Ganesan
Adv. Dhana Law Associates
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pitchai and 4 others
-
2.Indira
-
3.Citra
-
4.The Sub Registrar
-
5.The State rep by District Collector
Case History
-
02-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Counter
Sub Judge, Melur
-
07-Apr-2026
Counter
Sub Judge, Melur
-
16-Mar-2026
Counter
Sub Judge, Melur
-
12-Feb-2026
Counter
Sub Judge, Melur
-
12-Jan-2026
Counter
Sub Judge, Melur
-
18-Dec-2025
Batta
Sub Judge, Melur
-
26-Nov-2025
Counter
Sub Judge, Melur
-
05-Nov-2025
Counter
Sub Judge, Melur
-
25-Oct-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge, Melur
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge, Melur
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge, Melur
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge, Melur
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge, Melur
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge, Melur
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge, Melur
-
18-Jul-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
The court order in OS 222/2021 is heavily garbled and largely unreadable, with significant character encoding issues throughout the Tamil text that make it impossible to reliably determine the specific outcome or order passed. While the document identifies the case details (petitioner Muruga Ganesan, 45 years old, from Madurai, involving property/survey matters with multiple dated documents referenced), the substantive ruling and final order are not decipherable from the corrupted text. SKIP This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge, Melur
-
15-Jul-2025
Trial
Sub Judge, Melur
-
25-Jun-2025
Trial
Sub Judge, Melur
-
30-Apr-2025
Issues
Sub Judge, Melur
-
25-Apr-2025
Issues
Sub Judge, Melur
-
09-Apr-2025
Issues
Sub Judge, Melur
-
02-Apr-2025
Issues
Sub Judge, Melur
-
10-Mar-2025
Issues
Sub Judge, Melur
-
04-Feb-2025
Issues
Sub Judge, Melur
-
17-Dec-2024
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Melur
-
19-Nov-2024
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Melur
-
03-Oct-2024
Amendment
Sub Judge, Melur
-
27-Sep-2024
Amendment
Sub Judge, Melur
-
24-Sep-2024
Amendment
Sub Judge, Melur
-
28-Aug-2024
Amendment
Sub Judge, Melur
-
01-Aug-2024
Amendment
Sub Judge, Melur
-
08-Jul-2024
Amendment
Sub Judge, Melur
-
20-Jun-2024
Amendment
Sub Judge, Melur
-
05-Jun-2024
Amendment
Sub Judge, Melur
-
03-Apr-2024
Amendment
Sub Judge, Melur
-
25-Mar-2024
Steps
Sub Judge, Melur
-
12-Mar-2024
Steps
Sub Judge, Melur
-
28-Feb-2024
Steps
Sub Judge, Melur
-
09-Feb-2024
Steps
Sub Judge, Melur
-
31-Jan-2024
Steps
Sub Judge, Melur
-
30-Jan-2024
Restored
Sub Judge, Melur
-
30-Jan-2024
Steps
Sub Judge, Melur
-
19-Jul-2023
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
-
19-Jul-2023
Disposed
Sub Judge, Melur
-
21-Jun-2023
Amendment
Sub Judge, Melur
-
12-Jun-2023
Amendment
Sub Judge, Melur
-
11-Apr-2023
Amendment
Sub Judge, Melur
-
08-Mar-2023
Amendment
Sub Judge, Melur
-
07-Feb-2023
Amendment
Sub Judge, Melur
-
05-Jan-2023
Amendment
Sub Judge, Melur
-
29-Nov-2022
Issues
Sub Judge, Melur
-
14-Nov-2022
Issues
Sub Judge, Melur
-
31-Oct-2022
Issues
Sub Judge, Melur
-
12-Oct-2022
Issues
Sub Judge, Melur
-
13-Sep-2022
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Melur
-
03-Sep-2022
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Melur
-
11-Aug-2022
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Melur
-
02-Aug-2022
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Melur
-
06-Jul-2022
Steps
Sub Judge, Melur
-
02-Jun-2022
Steps
Sub Judge, Melur
-
21-Apr-2022
Steps
Sub Judge, Melur
-
16-Mar-2022
Steps
Sub Judge, Melur
-
02-Mar-2022
Steps
Sub Judge, Melur
-
06-Jan-2022
Issue of Service
Sub Judge, Melur
-
24-Nov-2021
Issue of Service
Sub Judge, Melur
-
06-Oct-2021
Issue of Service
Sub Judge, Melur
-
21-Sep-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Apr-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 222/2021
The court order in OS 222/2021 is heavily garbled and largely unreadable, with significant character encoding issues throughout the Tamil text that make it impossible to reliably determine the specific outcome or order passed. While the document identifies the case details (petitioner Muruga Ganesan, 45 years old, from Madurai, involving property/survey matters with multiple dated documents referenced), the substantive ruling and final order are not decipherable from the corrupted text. SKIP This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts