D.ChandhraSekar and others vs Murugesan and three others Advocate - V.Subramanian — 100238/2009
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section U/oVIIRule1ofcpc. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD150000602009
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
31-08-2009
Registration No
100238/2009
Registration Date
30-09-2009
Court
District Munsif Court, Melur
Judge
1-District Munsif, Melur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
D.ChandhraSekar and others
Adv. V.R.Subbaiah
Respondent(s)
Murugesan and three others Advocate - V.Subramanian
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Melur.
Evidence
Issue of Service
Steps
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-03-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 17-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 16-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 09-03-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Suit Allowed in Part: The court declared that the first plaintiff is entitled to the joint family property in question and issued a permanent injunction against the defendants. However, the plaintiffs' claim to a 2/3 share in additional properties (items 2-4 of the suit schedule) was dismissed, as was their claim for future profits from those properties. The court found that while the mother's sale of the property without court permission violated the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, the first defendant (as purchaser) cannot be penalized, but the mother is barred from unjustly enriching herself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Suit Allowed in Part: The court declared that the first plaintiff is entitled to the joint family property in question and issued a permanent injunction against the defendants. However, the plaintiffs' claim to a 2/3 share in additional properties (items 2-4 of the suit schedule) was dismissed, as was their claim for future profits from those properties. The court found that while the mother's sale of the property without court permission violated the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, the first defendant (as purchaser) cannot be penalized, but the mother is barred from unjustly enriching herself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts