SI of Police TMM Town PS vs Arjun — 1274/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),341,324,506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNMD140034502022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3450/2022
Filing Date
02-12-2022
Registration No
1274/2022
Registration Date
23-12-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
33
Police Station
THIRUMANGALAM TOWN
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI of Police TMM Town PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Arjun
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 11-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Tirumankalm acquitted the accused Arjun of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 341, 324, and 506(2), finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. Although the accused was charged with abusive language, unlawful restraint, causing hurt, and criminal intimidation following an alleged incident on January 24, 2021, the court determined that the key prosecution witnesses (the complainant and eyewitness) failed to provide credible testimony supporting the charges, and subsequently even filed a petition for recusal. The court granted the benefit of doubt to the accused and ordered his acquittal under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Tirumankalm acquitted the accused Arjun of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 341, 324, and 506(2), finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. Although the accused was charged with abusive language, unlawful restraint, causing hurt, and criminal intimidation following an alleged incident on January 24, 2021, the court determined that the key prosecution witnesses (the complainant and eyewitness) failed to provide credible testimony supporting the charges, and subsequently even filed a petition for recusal. The court granted the benefit of doubt to the accused and ordered his acquittal under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts