S.I. of police, Perungudi p.s., vs Guruvaiah and 5 others — 641/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147, 294(b0, 324, 506(2), 4. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMD140021212023

Case disposed

Filing Number

2121/2023

Filing Date

16-08-2023

Registration No

641/2023

Registration Date

23-08-2023

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

110

Police Station

PERUNGUDI

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 147, 294(b0, 324, 506(2), 4

Petitioner(s)

S.I. of police, Perungudi p.s.,

Adv. The APP

Respondent(s)

Guruvaiah and 5 others

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

25-03-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

Judgement

18-03-2026

Questioning

12-03-2026

Evidence

05-03-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Summary The Judicial Magistrate court in Thirumankalm acquitted all six accused individuals in a rioting and assault case (Crime No. 110/2023). The court found that while the prosecution witnesses testified about an incident on July 11, 2023 involving beating and threats, the state failed to establish direct evidence linking the accused to the alleged crimes beyond reasonable doubt. Applying the principle that benefit of doubt must favor the accused, the judge discharged them under IPC Sections 147, 294(b), 323, 324, 506(2) and other relevant provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate court in Thirumankalm acquitted all six accused individuals in a rioting and assault case (Crime No. 110/2023). The court found that while the prosecution witnesses testified about an incident on July 11, 2023 involving beating and threats, the state failed to establish direct evidence linking the accused to the alleged crimes beyond reasonable doubt. Applying the principle that benefit of doubt must favor the accused, the judge discharged them under IPC Sections 147, 294(b), 323, 324, 506(2) and other relevant provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case