Anna Nagar P.s. vs Udhaya @ Udhayakumar Advocate - VIJAYA PRABHAKARAN G — 1149/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010019062026

Filing Number

1500/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1149/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

Anna Nagar Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

1.Anna Nagar P.s.

Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

1.Udhaya @ Udhayakumar Advocate - VIJAYA PRABHAKARAN G
2.Vicky @ Vigneshkumar

Adv. VIJAYA PRABHAKARAN G

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
16-Mar-2026

Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

The Madurai Principal Sessions Judge dismissed bail petitions filed by accused Udhaya @ Udhayakumar and Vicky @ Vigneshkumar in a murder case (Crime No. 96/2026). The accused were charged under BNS sections 127(2), 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 118(1), and 103(1) for allegedly participating in a fatal assault on February 11, 2026. The court rejected their bail applications, citing the heinous nature of the offense, early stage of investigation, and the prosecution's strong objection, finding it premature to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
16-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal District and Sessions Judge
11-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 1149/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madurai Principal Sessions Judge dismissed bail petitions filed by accused Udhaya @ Udhayakumar and Vicky @ Vigneshkumar in a murder case (Crime No. 96/2026). The accused were charged under BNS sections 127(2), 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 118(1), and 103(1) for allegedly participating in a fatal assault on February 11, 2026. The court rejected their bail applications, citing the heinous nature of the offense, early stage of investigation, and the prosecution's strong objection, finding it premature to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.