Muthulakshmi vs Usilatti Taluka Ps. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 1042/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMD010016682026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
1299/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
1042/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
202
Police Station
Usilampatti Taluk Police Sttaion
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Muthulakshmi
Adv. SOUNDHARYA S
Banupriya
Adv. SOUNDHARYA S
Respondent(s)
Usilatti Taluka Ps (Police Station). Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted anticipatory bail to Muthulakshmi and Banupriya (accused A2 and A3) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 296(b), 351(2), 326(g), and 49 related to a bike arson during a matrimonial dispute. The court found limited overt acts against the petitioners, noted that co-accused A1 had already been granted bail by the High Court, and determined substantial investigation had been completed. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond each, daily police reporting for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted anticipatory bail to Muthulakshmi and Banupriya (accused A2 and A3) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 296(b), 351(2), 326(g), and 49 related to a bike arson during a matrimonial dispute. The court found limited overt acts against the petitioners, noted that co-accused A1 had already been granted bail by the High Court, and determined substantial investigation had been completed. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond each, daily police reporting for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts