Muthulakshmi vs Usilatti Taluka Ps. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 1042/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMD010016682026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
1299/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
1042/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
202
Police Station
Usilampatti Taluk Police Sttaion
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Muthulakshmi
Adv. SOUNDHARYA S
-
2.Banupriya
Adv. SOUNDHARYA S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Usilatti Taluka Ps (Police Station). Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted anticipatory bail to Muthulakshmi and Banupriya (accused A2 and A3) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 296(b), 351(2), 326(g), and 49 related to a bike arson during a matrimonial dispute. The court found limited overt acts against the petitioners, noted that co-accused A1 had already been granted bail by the High Court, and determined substantial investigation had been completed. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond each, daily police reporting for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1042/2026
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted anticipatory bail to Muthulakshmi and Banupriya (accused A2 and A3) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 296(b), 351(2), 326(g), and 49 related to a bike arson during a matrimonial dispute. The court found limited overt acts against the petitioners, noted that co-accused A1 had already been granted bail by the High Court, and determined substantial investigation had been completed. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond each, daily police reporting for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts