Muthulakshmi vs Usilatti Taluka Ps. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 1042/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010016682026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

1299/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

1042/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

202

Police Station

Usilampatti Taluk Police Sttaion

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Muthulakshmi

Adv. SOUNDHARYA S

Banupriya

Adv. SOUNDHARYA S

Respondent(s)

Usilatti Taluka Ps (Police Station). Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

07-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted anticipatory bail to Muthulakshmi and Banupriya (accused A2 and A3) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 296(b), 351(2), 326(g), and 49 related to a bike arson during a matrimonial dispute. The court found limited overt acts against the petitioners, noted that co-accused A1 had already been granted bail by the High Court, and determined substantial investigation had been completed. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond each, daily police reporting for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted anticipatory bail to Muthulakshmi and Banupriya (accused A2 and A3) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 296(b), 351(2), 326(g), and 49 related to a bike arson during a matrimonial dispute. The court found limited overt acts against the petitioners, noted that co-accused A1 had already been granted bail by the High Court, and determined substantial investigation had been completed. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond each, daily police reporting for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Madurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case