Ayyanar vs Keelavalavu P.s. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 966/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010015142026

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

1183/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

966/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Partially Allowed

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

44

Police Station

Keelavalavu Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ayyanar

    Adv. MANICKAM C

  2. 2.Arunkumar

    Adv. MANICKAM C

  3. 3.Viswa

    Adv. MANICKAM C

  4. 4.sarath

    Adv. MANICKAM C

  5. 5.Chinnaya

    Adv. MANICKAM C

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Keelavalavu P.s. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai partially granted the anticipatory bail petition. Accused persons A6 and A7 (petitioners 4 and 5) were granted anticipatory bail on conditions including executing a Rs. 10,000 bond each with sureties, surrendering within 15 days, and daily police reporting for 15 days. However, the petition was dismissed for accused A1, A2, and A5 (petitioners 1-3) due to serious allegations of armed assault with weapons and theft of gold ornaments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 966/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai partially granted the anticipatory bail petition. Accused persons A6 and A7 (petitioners 4 and 5) were granted anticipatory bail on conditions including executing a Rs. 10,000 bond each with sureties, surrendering within 15 days, and daily police reporting for 15 days. However, the petition was dismissed for accused A1, A2, and A5 (petitioners 1-3) due to serious allegations of armed assault with weapons and theft of gold ornaments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case