D.SANKAR vs R.KUMAR AND ONE OTHER — 1200257/2016

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 163,166. Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Await Reports Next hearing 04-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKR080001532016

Filing Number

1200257/2016

Filing Date

14-Jul-2016

Registration No

1200257/2016

Registration Date

14-Jul-2016

Court

Sub Court, Kulithalai

Judge

12-Sub Judge

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 163,166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.D.SANKAR

    Adv. T.K.NEELAMEGAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.R.KUMAR AND ONE OTHER

  2. 2.THE MANAGER,UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,KULITHALAI

    Adv. B.THIAGARAJAN

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  3. 17-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Sub Judge

  4. 08-Jan-2026

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  5. 04-Nov-2025

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  6. 11-Sep-2025

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  7. 17-Jul-2025

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  8. 15-Apr-2025

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  9. 20-Mar-2025

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  10. 27-Feb-2025

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  11. 05-Dec-2024

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  12. 17-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  13. 12-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  14. 08-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  15. 16-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  16. 02-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  17. 15-Jun-2024

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  18. 16-Apr-2024

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  19. 01-Feb-2024

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  20. 25-Jan-2024

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  21. 05-Dec-2023

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  22. 12-Oct-2023

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  23. 12-Sep-2023

    Steps

    Sub Judge

  24. 20-Jul-2023

    Steps

    Sub Judge

  25. 08-Jun-2023

    Await Reports

    Sub Judge

  26. 23-Mar-2023

    Await Records

    Sub Judge

  27. 09-Feb-2023

    Await Records

    Sub Judge

  28. 15-Dec-2022

    Await Records

    Sub Judge

  29. 03-Nov-2022

    Await Records

    Sub Judge

  30. 15-Sep-2022

    Await Records

    Sub Judge

  31. 22-Jul-2022

    Await Records

    Sub Judge

  32. 08-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  33. 25-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  34. 02-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  35. 16-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  36. 22-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  37. 13-Oct-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  38. 28-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  39. 09-Jun-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  40. 26-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  41. 22-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  42. 04-Nov-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  43. 05-Aug-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  44. 03-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  45. 20-Mar-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  46. 21-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  47. 22-Jan-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  48. 18-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  49. 25-Oct-2019

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  50. 25-Sep-2019

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  51. 21-Aug-2019

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  52. 03-Aug-2019

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  53. 29-Jul-2019

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  54. 23-Jul-2019

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  55. 17-Jun-2019

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  56. 12-Apr-2019

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  57. 29-Mar-2019

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  58. 18-Mar-2019

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  59. 02-Mar-2019

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  60. 25-Feb-2019

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition, holding that the applicant failed to establish sufficient grounds for relief. The court found that the evidence presented was inadequate and that the applicant had not complied with procedural requirements. The case was decided against the applicant with no substantive basis for intervention found. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  61. 25-Feb-2019

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  62. 11-Jan-2019

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  63. 09-Nov-2018

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  64. 17-Sep-2018

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  65. 06-Aug-2018

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  66. 18-Jun-2018

    Counter

    Sub Judge

  67. 28-Mar-2018

    Counter

    Sub Judge

  68. 22-Jan-2018

    Counter

    Sub Judge

  69. 06-Dec-2017

    Counter

    Sub Judge

  70. 23-Oct-2017

    Counter

    Sub Judge

  71. 17-Aug-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  72. 14-Jul-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1200257/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition, holding that the applicant failed to establish sufficient grounds for relief. The court found that the evidence presented was inadequate and that the applicant had not complied with procedural requirements. The case was decided against the applicant with no substantive basis for intervention found. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case