MINOR KARAN @ SANJAISREE 1 OTHER vs MUTHUSAMY GOUNDER 5 OTHERS Advocate - P.SARAVANAN — 300121/2011

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKR030001182011

Steps

Next Hearing

05th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

300121/2011

Filing Date

28-03-2011

Registration No

300121/2011

Registration Date

28-03-2011

Court

Principal Sub Court, Karur

Judge

3-Principal Sub Judge

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section OR7R1

Petitioner(s)

MINOR KARAN @ SANJAISREE 1 OTHER

Adv. K.NATARAJAN

Respondent(s)

MUTHUSAMY GOUNDER 5 OTHERS Advocate - P.SARAVANAN

KANNAYAN

Adv. P.K.VAITHEESWARAN

MANOHARAN

VIJAYA

Adv. P.K.VAITHEESWARAN

KARUNAKARAN

Adv. P.K.VAITHEESWARAN

E.K.SUBRAMANIAN

Adv. P.K.VAITHEESWARAN

ARUKKANI AMMAL (DIED)

K.KUPPUSAMY

S.RAMAYEE AMMAL

P.KANNAMMAL

M.SUBRAMANI

KARUPPANNAN (DIED)

K.SEKAR

K.MAHESHWARI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Principal Sub Judge

01-04-2026

Steps

09-03-2026

Steps

13-02-2026

Steps

30-01-2026

Steps

12-01-2026

Appearance

Interim Orders

01-11-2022
Copy of Judgment

Summary Suit Dismissed - The court dismissed a partition suit filed by plaintiffs (Sanjay Ram and Surupaka) against defendants seeking division of ancestral property. The court held that necessary parties were not joined to the suit, making it fatal to the case. The court found that the second defendant's two daughters should have been made parties to the partition suit, and their non-joinder rendered the suit unmaintainable. Accordingly, the suit was dismissed without awarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Suit Dismissed - The court dismissed a partition suit filed by plaintiffs (Sanjay Ram and Surupaka) against defendants seeking division of ancestral property. The court held that necessary parties were not joined to the suit, making it fatal to the case. The court found that the second defendant's two daughters should have been made parties to the partition suit, and their non-joinder rendered the suit unmaintainable. Accordingly, the suit was dismissed without awarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal Sub Court, Karur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case