THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THANTHONIMALAI P.S. vs B.SABARI HARAN — 552/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNKR020075652024

Filing Number

6694/2024

Filing Date

22-Apr-2022

Registration No

552/2024

Registration Date

22-Apr-2022

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate No.I

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 392

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THANTHONIMALAI P.S.

    Adv. APP GRADE II

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.B.SABARI HARAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary Court Decision: The Criminal Court Judge No. 1 in Karur acquitted the accused under IPC Section 392 (robbery), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while the victim's testimony and circumstantial evidence suggested a gold chain theft occurred on January 27, 2021, the identification of the accused remained doubtful due to inconsistencies in witness statements and lack of direct evidence linking the accused to the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  10. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  11. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  12. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  13. 11-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  14. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  15. 31-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  16. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  17. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  18. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  19. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  20. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  21. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  22. 05-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  23. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  24. 07-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  25. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  26. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  27. 11-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  28. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  29. 09-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  30. 17-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  31. 14-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  32. 17-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  33. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  34. 29-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  35. 06-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  36. 11-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  37. 18-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  38. 09-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 22-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 552/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The Criminal Court Judge No. 1 in Karur acquitted the accused under IPC Section 392 (robbery), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while the victim's testimony and circumstantial evidence suggested a gold chain theft occurred on January 27, 2021, the identification of the accused remained doubtful due to inconsistencies in witness statements and lack of direct evidence linking the accused to the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case