THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARUR TOWN P.S. vs M.DINESH (KAKKAVADI DHINESH) AND 2 OTHERS — 446/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 11th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKR020014642022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1244/2022
Filing Date
15-07-2022
Registration No
446/2025
Registration Date
23-05-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Karur
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
1382
Police Station
Karur Town P.S
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARUR TOWN P.S.
Adv. APP. GRADE II
Respondent(s)
M.DINESH (KAKKAVADI DHINESH) AND 2 OTHERS
SILAMBARASAN
DHANDAPANI
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Disposed
Judgement
Evidence
Trial
Questioning
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 04-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 30-12-2025 | Trial | |
| 29-12-2025 | Questioning |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The Criminal Court (Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Karur) acquitted three accused persons charged under IPC Section 294(b) and Tamil Nadu Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act Section 4 (2003), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court concluded that the government's evidence, consisting primarily of witness testimony from investigating officers, was insufficient and contradictory to establish the alleged offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Judgment Summary The Criminal Court (Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Karur) acquitted three accused persons charged under IPC Section 294(b) and Tamil Nadu Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act Section 4 (2003), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court concluded that the government's evidence, consisting primarily of witness testimony from investigating officers, was insufficient and contradictory to establish the alleged offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts