INSPECTOR OF POLICE KULITHALAI PS vs Ranjith Kamaraj — 40/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,294(b),307,34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNKR010008712025

Filing Number

581/2025

Filing Date

16-May-2024

Registration No

40/2025

Registration Date

13-Mar-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Karur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

178

Police Station

Kulithalai P.S

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,294(b),307,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INSPECTOR OF POLICE KULITHALAI PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ranjith Kamaraj

  2. 2.Prabaharan

  3. 3.Rajesh

  4. 4.Karupannan

  5. 5.Shanmugam

  6. 6.Rajendran

  7. 7.Palaniyappan

  8. 8.Sakthivel

  9. 9.Duraisamy

  10. 10.Mahendran

  11. 11.Thiyagarajan

  12. 12.Manivel

  13. 13.Murugesan

  14. 14.Muthusamy

  15. 15.Paramasivam

  16. 16.Velmurugan

  17. 17.Maheshwaran

  18. 18.Ponnadi

  19. 19.Rajkumar

  20. 20.Vivekandan

  21. 21.Sekar

  22. 22.Vembadi

  23. 23.Gurunathan

  24. 24.Ponnampalam

  25. 25.Selvarasu

  26. 26.Ramesh

  27. 27.Rathinagiri

  28. 28.Tamilselvan

  29. 29.Banu

  30. 30.Thilagavathi

  31. 31.Rajathi

  32. 32.Rani

  33. 33.Cirumbayi

  34. 34.Mahalingam

  35. 35.Sankar

  36. 36.Balu Balasubramanian

  37. 37.Balasubramanian

  38. 38.Parameshwaran

  39. 39.Kamaraj Senthilkumar

  40. 40.Rajeshwari

  41. 41.Kathirvel

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The District & Sessions Judge in Karur acquitted all 35 accused persons of charges under IPC sections 147 (unlawful assembly), 148 (armed unlawful assembly), 294(b) (obscene language), and 307 (attempt to murder) arising from an April 5, 2018 incident during a temple festival. The court found that key prosecution witnesses (PW1-PW5) turned hostile, with the complainant unable to identify attackers due to darkness, and determined there was insufficient independent corroborative evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    District Judge

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge

  9. 19-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Judge

  10. 17-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  11. 08-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  12. 02-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Judge

  13. 30-Jul-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Judge

  14. 23-Jul-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Judge

  15. 23-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Judge

  16. 23-Jun-2025

    Restored

    District Judge

  17. 23-Jun-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Judge

  18. 24-Apr-2025

    Disposed

    District Judge

  19. 23-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    District Judge

  20. 23-Apr-2025

    Restored

    District Judge

  21. 23-Apr-2025

    Disposed

    District Judge

  22. 09-Apr-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Judge

  23. 13-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 16-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 40/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The District & Sessions Judge in Karur acquitted all 35 accused persons of charges under IPC sections 147 (unlawful assembly), 148 (armed unlawful assembly), 294(b) (obscene language), and 307 (attempt to murder) arising from an April 5, 2018 incident during a temple festival. The court found that key prosecution witnesses (PW1-PW5) turned hostile, with the complainant unable to identify attackers due to darkness, and determined there was insufficient independent corroborative evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case